10. PASCHALINE ONWUKA
INTRODUCTION
Many African countries are rich in mineral resources. This has not always been a blessing. The huge revenues from commodity exports have been very volatile. Furthermore, these revenues are often temporary and thus sound fiscal policies are required to ensure that sufficient investment takes place in productive and human capital for when resources run out. This is a difficult task, since the volatility of commodity export revenues invites excessive public spending without proper scrutiny. The huge volatility of resource prices also harms both domestic and foreign direct investment and depresses economic growth by a large amount, especially if domestic financial institutions are poorly developed. Many resource-rich African countries also suffer from real appreciation of their exchange rates induced by the huge resource export revenues and aid flows. This really hampers prospects for non-resource exports in those countries. The sheer volume of resource revenues diverts attention away from the task of diversifying exports away from commodities to labour-intensive manufacturing exports.
THE DUTCH DISEASE PARADOX- THE PROBLEM
The term Dutch Disease refers to the fears of de-industrialization that gripped the Netherlands as a result of the appreciation of the Dutch currency that followed the discovery of natural gas deposits. The appreciation of the Dutch currency that followed the gas export boom reduced the profitability of manufacturing and service exports. Total exports decreased markedly to GDP during the 1960s. Sachs and Warner (1995, 1997 and 1999) found a detrimental impact of natural resource exports on growth, which they attributed to Dutch Disease. Acemoglu et al. (2001, 2002 and 2004) found that the nature of institutions is more important than resources. Lederman and Mahoney (2007) query both results and argue that natural resource rents boost economic growth.
The Dutch Disease can be a real disease and a source of persistent slow growth, if there is something special about the sources of growth in manufacturing (decline in leading technological-knowledge sector) with production externalities or the learning-bydoing stressed by Matsuyama (2006) where he assumed that there are increasing returns to scale in manufacturing, but not in the resource sector. In principle the Dutch Disease can be seen as a matter of one sector benefiting partly at the expense of others, therefore it is not an impediment per se; however the disease is potentially harmful if there is something special about the reallocation of resources between sectors, for example from high-tech service industries to low primary production (Gylfason 2005).
The paradox effect of natural resource abundance on the economy is commonly described as an economy experiencing an export boom, and divided into three sectors: (a) the booming export sector; (b) the lagging export sector – traditional exports - as the two traded good sectors; and (c) the non-traded goods sector, which essentially supplies domestic residents and might include retail trade, services and construction. In the presence of the Dutch Disease, the traditional export sector gets crowded out by the other two sectors (Bevan et.al, 2009).
The Case of Nigeria- The Oil booming Nation
The growth decomposition of Nigeria’s performance since 1965, provided in Sala-i-Martin and Subramanian (2003), presents two notable characteristics which are: the rapid accumulation of physical capital, averaging 6.7 percent per year; and negative TFP growth, averaging 1.2 per year. Oil was responsible for the physical capital accumulation, suggested by the timing of the surge in investment. Between 1973 and 1980, the years of the two majors oil prices shocks, the capital stock grew at an average rate of 14 percent per year, which represented a three-fold increase in the country’s capital stock in 8 years. A substantial part of the increase was public capital spending financed by the surging oil revenues. Public investment as a share of GDP rose by over 7 percentage points during the period of the oil shocks. Between the 1960s and the end of the second oil shock the share of public sector in capital formation increased from 20 percent to 55 percent; and the real GDP growth (Fig.1) rate has been erratic compared to Indonesia for the same period.
(Fig. 1) Nigeria: Real GDP Growth from the early 1970s - 2006
Source: World Development Indicator database, World Bank.
THE WAY FORWARD: RECOMMENDATIONS
There should be a review of all mechanisms and management arrangements related to mineral revenues in every stage of the resource chain. There should also be a focus on assessing the overall mineral wealth governance and management arrangements in place from the collection of taxes and royalties to sound and sustainable projects, including possibly project monitoring, hence addressing the resource paradox.
In a bid to reduce poverty and foster broad-based economic growth in Africa, a well formulated and prioritized budget is critical in this regard. With substantial mineral wealth, mineral-rich countries should be able to make rapid progress toward a sustained-growth-path and poverty reduction. The budget is both an instrument of economic management and an implicit policy statement, as it sets relative levels of spending and priorities for different programs and activities.
There should be enforcement of property rights for a broad cross-section of society, so that a variety of individuals have incentives to invest and take part in economic life; There should be Constraints on the actions of elites, politicians, and other powerful groups so that these people cannot expropriate the incomes and investment of others in the society or create a highly uneven playing field; There should also be Provision of some degree of equal opportunity for broad segments of the society, so that they can make investments, especially in human capital, and participate in productive economic activities.
CONCLUSION
The purpose of this essay has been to put together a comprehensive approach that could contribute to address the resource paradox issue in mineral sector in Africa, while suggesting the strengthening of windfall management mechanisms and institutions, and the implementation of good economic policies toward a sustained growth-path and hence, job creation and durable poverty reduction in Africa.
REFERENCES
Acemoglu, Daron, Simon Johnson, and James A. Robinson. 2001a. “An African Success Story: Botswana.” Working Paper 01–37, Department of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA.
Bevan, D; P Collier, J.W Gunning, 2009, The Political Economy of Poverty, Equity, and Growth: Nigeria and Indonesia, Oxford University Press.
Gylfason, (2005). Context Matters – Rethinking the Resource Curse in Sub-Saharan Africa. Working Papers No1. Mathias Basedau
Lederman, W; and R. Mahoney, 2007, Tropics, Germs and Crops: How Endowments influence Economic Development, mimeo, Center for Global Development and Institute for International Economics.
Matsuyama, (2006). Meeting the Challenge of the Resource Curse – International Experiences in Managing the Risks and Realizing the Opportunities of Non-Renewable Natural Resource Revenues – United Nations Development Programme – January 2006.
Sachs, Jeffrey D; and Warner, Andrew M. (1999) the Big push, Natural Resource Booms and Growth. Journal of Development Economics, Vol59, 43-76. ------ 1995. Natural Resource Abundance and Economic Growth. Working paper 5398 (Cambridge, Massachusetts: National Bureau of Economic Research). ------1997. Natural Resource Abundance and Economic Growth. Harvard University, Cambridge MA.(November, 1997.